From the ACHR Newsletter    Housing by People in Asia


No 13   June 2001

 

PAKISTAN

Latest skirmish in the long battle against urban infrastructure boondoggles

After a struggle of several years, Karachi NGOs, concerned professionals and community organizations have joined forces to stop another ADB loan of US$75 million and to replace a grandiose KWSB sewerage project with a realistic one.  Here’s the condensed version of how they did it, drawn from conversations with and reports by the groups who led the struggle, and in so doing became the de facto designers of Karachi’s sewers. 

Meanwhile, 42 Billion Rupees later:  Of the 350 million gallons of waste water Karachi produces every day, only 30 million gallons are treated by the KWSB’s three treatment plants (two built by foreign loans) which have the capacity to treat 151 million gallons.  All the rest flows into the city’s 9 natural drainage nullahs, and out into the sea - untreated.  Foreign-financed infrastructure projects may be bankrupting Pakistan, but for the banks, the big construction companies and the high-flying consultants, they are real money-spinners

 

1.  First weapon  INFORMATION

Understanding the proposed project and the city's ground realities

Back in 1992, the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board proposed a major project to build main trunk sewers in Orangi, the sprawling township of 1.2 million people, as part of it’s massive Greater Karachi Sewerage Plan.  When OPP examined the project, which was to be financed by ADB, they were in for a shock:  the proposed trunks weren’t designed to pick up the functioning sewers already built by communities or by municipal councilors, all of which drained into the natural drainage nullahs.  The KMC, ADB consultants and KWSB had planned for he area as if this work didn’t exist.  Instead of laying trunk sewers along the natural drains, their plans called for pumping sewage uphill, over great distance, to large treatment plants.  As a result, the whole settlement would have had to be dug up to link with the proposed system. 

It was only through careful research, well-organized opposition and more sensible counter-proposals that a 1.3 billion Rupee mega-booboo was eventually scaled down to a more sensible 250 million Rupee plan to clean out Orangi’s existing natural drains and convert them into trunk sewers.  And for this work, the city had funds - only a fraction of the ADB loan was utilized. 

This led OPP into documenting existing sewers in the rest of Karachi.  Their surveys revealed that in 82% of the 79,426 lanes of the city’s 136 katchi abadis (informal settlements where 60% of Karachi’s population lives), people had invested billions of rupees in building sewers.  It wasn’t always the best work, but a system was in place and it was carrying most of the city’s sewage into Karachi’s nine natural drainage nullahs.  In 80% of the areas planned by the Karachi Development Authority, as well, sewage was going into the nullahs.  If all this work were integrated into the infrastructure being planned and implemented under KWSB, the projects would be a fraction of their present costs and completed in a fraction of the time.  And the poor, instead of contractors and consultants, would be the beneficiaries!

This expensive and faulty planning persisted, however - ADB loans kept coming, Sindh Province plunged further into debt and more KWSB sewage projects were built.  But because they’re not picking up effluent from most of the city’s existing sewers, new trunks run dry, treatment plants don’t receive enough effluent, and even after borrowing Rs 42 billion, 80% of Karachi’s sewage still flows untreated into the sea.

When KWSB announced yet another major sewage project in Korangi, an area with a population of 1.3 million, OPP recognized all the elements of past mistakes: it didn’t follow the natural drains, it ignored sewer systems which already exist in 80% of the area and unless all the sewers were re-laid (costing additional billions of rupees) to link to the new KWSB trunks, effluent from the area would never reach the proposed treatment plant.  The project was to cost US$100 million - $75 million loaned from ADB and $25 million raised locally.  By now, the OPP and its allies were on familiar ground, and knew what to do.  By documenting the existing system in Korangi, developing an alternative plan and opening up the issue with the communities, NGOs and civic groups, they eventually convinced the provincial governor to cancel the loan.

  

 2.  Second Weapon :  A better plan       THE ALTERNATIVE PLAN

Sustainable, affordable means of disposing of Karachi's sewage . . .

 Once the ADB loan for Korangi was finally cancelled, a joint committee of local officials and senior engineers was set up to work out an alternative proposal.  Within six months, the OPP-RTI had developed an alternative sewage disposal plan for Korangi (as well as a proposal for a more realistic sewage disposal system for the whole of Karachi).  The alternative plan is cost effective and corresponds to ground realities:  by complimenting the existing system, using local resources and indigenous technology rather than opting for foreign loans and costly important equipment and materials, the cost of developing Korangi’s sewers has been reduced to 20% of what KWSB proposed.  And it can be paid for by resources at hand in the Karachi Municipal Corporation - there is no need for any external loans.  Since then, there has been a lot of interest from the government, and the KMC has started upgrading the natural drains, according to the OPP"s plan. 

 “The whole nature of sewage planning changes once you accept what already exists, and you try to work around that and upgrade that.” 
Arif Hasan, OPP

 At the project level, these principals are being accepted, but at policy level, heated debate continues about the “think big” approach, which the provincial government is reluctant to let go.  Why?  A  clear division in the decision-making process means that these projects are developed at the provincial level, by sewage and water supply agencies with notoriously little sense of ground realities.  The municipal governments who then get handed these projects to manage are not always happy with what they’ve been given.  Because they have contact with local people and local realities (and have to balance their books), they tend to accept these principals immediately.

More lessons in sensible and non-sensible urban planning


KWSB's Korangi Plan


OPP's Alternative Plan


Plan

Superimposes an entirely new sewage system, ignoring existing sewer and natural drainage systems

Upgrades and expands the existing functional sewage systems after carefully documenting these systems.


Cost


US$ 100 million


US$ 20 million


Financing

ADB Loan for US $75 million, $25 million raised locally

Can be done in 6 years using local funds available with the KMC.  No loan is required.


Extra costs

All existing lane and secondary sewers will have to be dug up and replaced to link with new system, costing million of dollars above the project costs.

None.  By picking up flow from existing sewers, the plan utilizes billions of rupees investment in sewage infrastructure already made by communities and the Karachi Municipality.


Technology

Foreign, expensive, inappropriate for Karachi’s fiscal and technological realities, with high maintenance costs.

Low-cost, easy-to-maintain indigenous technology uses gravity flow, natural drainage and shallow sewers.


Design

By foreign consultants

By local engineers and sewage specialists with deep understanding of local realities, resources and limitations.


Drainage

Calls for heavy pumping stations to pump sewage uphill, across long distances to centralized treatment plants, and faulty and un-maintainable deep sewers.

Upgrades existing natural drainage nullahs by converting them into box culverts or shallow trunk sewers, so no realignments are needed to pick up existing flows.


Treatment

Centralized in 3 or 4 large, expensive treatment plants which are not on natural drainage nullahs.

Decentralized to small, inexpensive treatment plants built at the ends of natural drainage nullahs;  also explores eco-friendly alternative treatment systems such as marine outfalls and lagoons.


Contracting

Built by foreign contractors, to “international” specifications, at international rates  (5 - 15 times local rates) with imported materials (even if manufactured cheaper locally).

Built by local contractors, municipal staff and local communities, at local rates, making full use of local materials, local workers, local expertise and indigenous innovations. 

 

3.  Third Weapon :  Collective action by many groups . . .

 It took more than a good alternative plan to get the Korangi loan canceled.  A large network of civil groups brought their separate expertise and collective clout to battle against the big guns of external-loan-driven development and shows that effectively advocating for development through indigenous resources takes collective thinking and informed discussion between a wide range of stake-holders.

 Karachi’s sewage disposal problem is a reality which cuts across sectors, affecting the whole city’s health, environmental quality and development.  To understand the issue, 22 public forums were organized by the Urban Resource Center between 1998 and 2000, in which activists, NGOs, researchers, journalists, government officials and community organizations from Korangi and other areas learned about the implications of the ADB-funded project and the alternative plan.  Press reports of these forums helped initiate wider debate on the Korangi loan, and the city’s sewage problems.  Collaboration in Reforms for Efficient and Equitable Development (CREED), a large alliance of prominent NGOs, community groups and development organizations, was central in lobbying against the ADB loan.  During the struggle, allies turned up in some unexpected quarters.  The provincial Department of Finance became a staunch supporter of the OPP’s plan, not out of any particular convictions about sewerage, but because KSWB’s failure to service earlier loans was causing them accounting nightmares - they wanted to balance their books!

 So great was ADB and federal government pressure that when the Governor of Sindh was persuaded to cancel the loan in 1999, he was sacked and the loan deadline was extended, sending the groups back into more rounds of petitions and meetings.  Even after ADB canceled the loan in September ‘99 and acknowledged the failure of previous KWSP projects, the Federal government and ADB mission continued pressuring the Sindh Government to rescind the decision and accept the loan.  To augment their case, a presentation was made by citizens groups to the Pakistan’s Chief Executive, finance ministers and local government. Finally in February 2000, the loan was canceled for good and OPP‘s low-cost alternative  accepted.

 An ironic postscript :   After all this, the Government of Sindh and the World Bank announced in June 2000 a workshop entitled “Water and Sewerage in Karachi:  The way forward”,  to which the OPP, URC and CREED were conspicuously not invited.  Everyone spelled a rat.  But thanks to an extremely effective grapevine, they showed up anyway, having drafted in a preparatory consultation with 59 other groups a policy paper on water and sanitation in the city.  Their clear message for the room-full of lap-top-bearing World Bank consultants was “No thanks to more loans” and that the “way forward” was through local resources and local technology.  

Update
Pakistan and DEBT  posted June 3 2002

 

Once upon a time ... governments of developing countries had to live within their means, and when planning infrastructure, had to find solutions which matched their fiscal realities and drew on local expertise.  Not any more!  

Since the 1970s, those governments have had a hard time resisting aggressive offers of unlimited credit from the World Bank or ADB, or the glamorous “think big” infrastructure schemes these institutions promote.  Although it has led to innumerable ill-conceived and expensive mega-disasters and threatens to bankrupt countries it claims to aid, the love affair between poor governments and international finance shows little sign of cooling.

Pakistan, where a staggering 52% of the national budget goes into servicing foreign loans, is a case in point.  

Over the past 18 years, the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board has accumulated a debt of 46 Billion Rupees to finance a series of large sewerage projects, which to date treat less than 12% of the city’s sewage.  

Because KWSB hasn’t even begun paying back all that money, provincial revenues badly needed for education and health are being increasingly deflected into into servicing that debt.  

 

For News on 
Pakistan and World Bank Loans Protest   June 14 2001
go    HERE

 

 

More Information on Karachi

3 BOOKS

Understanding Karachi
by Arif Hasan

When many of us dip into this book, we realize with some embarrassment how little we know about the real workings of our own cities, outside of the particular sector we work in.  Arif Hasan’s study of Karachi comes out of a lifetime watching the sprawling city of Karachi grow and figuring out what forces and what relationships determine the direction and nature of its social and physical development. 

While the book is specifically about one of Asia’s mega-cities, it’s system of urban analysis offers a very clear framework for shaping our inquiry into the workings of our own cities and for seeing sanitation, transport, governance and urban history as all being interconnected, and as windows for understanding today’s problems and solutions to urban poverty

 

Housing For the Poor

This book brings together eight reports on Pakistan’s housing sector prepared by Arif Hasan over the last 14 years, all of which turn a critical eye on the government’s housing policies and the informal sector and community responses to these policies. 

The book looks at several important and innovative housing initiatives and places them within the social, economic and political realities of Pakistan in general, and low-income groups in particular. 

 

Transforming Urban Settlements

This book by S. Akbar Zaidi is the first in-depth, independent, critical assessment of the Orangi Pilot Project’s Low-cost sanitation program.

 
It looks at the values and organizational culture which have shaped the organization, and the methodology of its work. 

 

Copies of all three books are available with ACHR or can be ordered directly from the City Press publisher.

 CITY PRESS,
316 Madina City Mall,
Abdullah Haroon Road,
Saddar,  Karachi 74400,  PAKISTAN

Tel (92-21) 565-0623

E-mail:   
aaj@digicom.net.pk

 

A link to the

Urban Resource Centre
in Karachi

 

More information on Pakistan
on the ACHR site

Pakistan and DEBT

The Rationale Urban Resource Centre Karachi 


A Visit URC Karachi


Arif Hasan 
Urban Heroes Award Plus

A quick visit to 
Orangi Pilot Project 

 


OPP’s thick, informative quarterly reports have been coming out for 21 years now. 

From January, 2001, the OPP Report comes out in a new, more reader-friendly format.

CONTACT
Perween Rahman

Orangi Pilot Project Research and Training Institute - OPP-RTI

ST- 4, Sector 5/A,  Qasba Colony,  Manghopir Road,  Karachi 75800,  
PAKISTAN

Telephone       
92 21 665-2297 /  665-8021          
Fax  (92 21) 666-5696

e-mail              opprti@digicom.net.pk