We all know the kinds of "tools" that are used in more
formal kinds of training.
Besides flip charts, white-boards, and
overhead projectors, there are brain-storming sessions, check-ins,
trust-building exercises, ice-breakers, roll-playing.
What about the tools that people use?
When something that poor communities do in one place is found to be
useful, it gets repeated. With repetition, that thing becomes a feature
of their work and begins being used with more intention. The more it is
used, the more it gets refined and standardized. Before you know it, you’ve
got bona fide tool.
A people’s tool.
Through transfer and adaptation,
which are at the heart of community exchange, these tools get reinvented
in other places, creating new tools. As with all tools, people master
them only by using them — tools that help them to negotiate with the
state, to explore house design possibilities, to organise a savings
scheme, to analyze conditions in their settlements. It is a quality of
most of the really good tools that they educate and mobilize at the same
time — they have a double edge — they have both practical and
strategic value to communities in their struggle for land tenure, secure
houses, basic services and jobs.
Stocking leaders with tools:
Community leaders need tools in order to mobilize other poor
communities, to form that critical mass which is prerequisite to
bringing about real change. These kinds of tools are emerging gradually,
from experiments and practical application — many are being actively
used within exchange programmes. People now have a set of precedents, a
protocol. They’ve been to other places, seen a variety of tools being
used. They know how to use them, know what to expect, know what to do.
They’ve become managers of their own learning.
There is a need to explore this new paradigm in light of the
globalization and new systems of internationalism which are now having
an impact on local and national situations, but which are short on
solutions that work for the poor.
How can we provide investments to actors in the Asian region to expand
the capacities of informal settlements to negotiate for their own
development needs?
A very important part of the exchange process is to explore new
solutions in which priorities are determined by communities themselves,
to try them out and spread them around if they work. When we look at the
community processes that are bubbling along in Asia and in Africa, we
have to ask whether there are negotiations going on between communities
and cities? If so, what skills assist them to leverage these
negotiations and what tools help build those skills?
In the following pages we take a brief look at a few
of the TOOLS
that are transferred in typical community to community exchanges supported by
ACHR's TAP programme and Slum Dwellers International.